An example of the invisibility rule you have so much issue with.
Negative Progression Betting Systems
Ability Item Creation wrote: A creator be able to create an item at a bring down caster level than her own, although never lower than the minimum aim needed to cast the needed add up to. That said, it can be dreary to go through a lot of complex effort and end up along with a useless dagger and a a small amount of gold for all of your agitate. However, if you are taking fragmentary damage such as if you are bleeding or on fire , your spells are not disrupted in this way. Quite simply, these strategies ask that players increase their individual ante with every winning hand, and a long time ago again the only variable is the precise system that you use after that the multipliers that you apply en route for your betting unit. Spellcasters are allay by far the most powerful, after that martial classes are still sad. Additionally a Ranger with the right array spells and feats can put absent a lot of damage equal en route for a Sorceror.
Fourth Edition was much more abstract, along with most of its rules only pertaining to the exchange of damage all the rage combat. Kudaku wrote:. Else it becomes a massive min-maxing effort of meta and powegaming with hours of micromanaging your action-economy. Fair enough. I essentially prefer it when specialized classes are weaker. So, six points made.